🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on the legislature to enact a bill increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," commented the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. An organization founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," said a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the local level due to national stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, further states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.