🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic discussions with Washington provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations was effective, and shared recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to resume talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Path

Araghchi is navigating a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader claiming the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations used their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the deal to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Status

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations restart.

Trump last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Stance

In his address to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be ended by military means. He stated the strikes started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making faith hard to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Primary Solution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly sought to impose their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the ultimate resolution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be respected."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, stays intact. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more united, and more supportive of the government and the country in the wake of this assault."